NATO's eastward expansion faces criticism
The war in Ukraine and Sweden's membership are the main topics of discussion at the NATO summit in Vilnius starting today, while the North Atlantic Alliance's expansion eastwards is also a matter of great controversy.
NATO's eastward expansion faces criticism
Geurasia

NATO's eastward expansion faces criticism

Photo: AFP/Emmanuel Dunand
Mariann Őry 11/07/2023 06:00

The war in Ukraine and Sweden's membership are the main topics of discussion at the NATO summit in Vilnius starting today, while the North Atlantic Alliance's expansion eastwards is also a matter of great controversy.

South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol also attends the summit, alongside the leaders of Japan, Australia and New Zealand, Reuters reported.

According to Bloomberg, some NATO states share the view that the biggest challenge to the alliance is not Russia, but China, and "NATO is more willing to display a military presence — if mostly confined to joint drills — closer to China". The article added that "there have also been concerns about pitching an alliance with a defensive remit into a broader tussle for influence between the US and China".

For months, NATO officials have been discussing plans to open a liaison office in Japan, which would represent the allies’ first outpost in the region at a time of growing tension between the West and China, Politico recalled in an article last week. The newspaper reported that "French President Emmanuel Macron has put his foot down, insisting such geographical expansion would risk shifting the alliance’s remit too far from its original North Atlantic focus". "We are not in favour as a matter of principle," an Elysée Palace official told reporters on Friday. "As far as the office is concerned, the Japanese authorities themselves have told us that they are not extremely attached to it," the official added. The French official insisted that NATO is geographically confined to the North Atlantic.

According to Nikkei Asia's source, "while there is general consensus on the need to deepen engagement with Indo-Pacific partners given modern-day concerns such as cybersecurity that transcend geography, allies remain divided over the expansion of NATO's footprint into the region. Significantly, language over establishing a NATO liaison office in Tokyo was removed from the final joint communique". "A sentence noting that NATO will continue discussions with the Japanese government toward opening an office in Tokyo had survived several rounds of discussions, but was deleted in the last round of talks," the source added.

The news agency reminded that "France had openly opposed the plan on the basis that it would send the wrong message to China and to Southeast Asian countries that are nervous about choosing sides in the broader Washington-Beijing rivalry". According to Thitinan Pongsudhirak, a professor of political science at Chulalongkorn University in Bangkok, Southeast Asia would "broadly would see NATO's Indo-Pacific institutionalization in Tokyo as a challenge to ASEAN centrality".

Photo: AFP/Emmanuel Dunand
"Europeans have been fighting each other for the better part of three hundred years, including giving the rest of us two World Wars in the last hundred," former Australian PM Paul Keating wrote in an op-ed published by Pearls and Irritations. "Exporting that malicious poison to Asia would be akin to Asia welcoming the plague upon itself," he added. Emmanuel Macron is doing the world a service putting a spike into Jens Stoltenberg’s wheel – reminding all of us that NATO is a military organisation, not a civil one and an organisation focused on Europe and the Atlantic," Keating noted.

"NATO's creep into the region is clearly targeting China, which NATO now claims poses 'systemic challenges' to it. Such rhetoric could have come straight from Washington's mouth, showing who is in the driving seat as the military juggernaut continues its relentless push eastward," China Daily stressed in an editorial on Sunday. According to the Chinese newspaper, "by not allowing their differences to escalate into acrimony, Asian countries have been able to maintain peace and stability in the region, cultivating a conducive environment for the region's strong development momentum in the past decades. NATO's move to establish a liaison office in Japan is an initial foray into the region that bodes ill, no matter how it is sliced".

"Japan's deeper collusion with NATO poses a major threat to regional, even global, peace and stability," Zhang Mei and Lyu Yaodong of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences stressed in an op-ed in China Daily. Referring to Macron's remarks, the experts wrote that "Japan should listen to such voice of reason and focus on the intractable crises it's currently facing — such as its decreasing birth rate, aging population and natural disasters — rather than on colluding with Europe and the US to suppress China and getting lost in the illusion of defending the so-called international order in the region".

We use cookies on our website. If you consent to their use, we use them to measure and analyze the use of the website.
Information and Settings